Thrush Svartehjertet wrote:Not the * formatting of these message boards?
Lord Dubh wrote:Thrush Svartehjertet wrote:Not the * formatting of these message boards?
Stop being lazy * and re-size them before uploading them...
Lord Valfryn wrote:You dont like your stuff being modified or do you not like them being linked? I can remove them if it bothers you. I did give pause before using them, but I figured that since you linked the pics to the darkon site, you wouldnt mind them being used elsewhere on the site. (That and they were such excellent depictions of what I was trying to convey).
fingers630 wrote:for some spells yes. a few have other components instead of natures symbol (enchant bow, light, poison prot)
Sir Gwydion wrote:fingers630 wrote:for some spells yes. a few have other components instead of natures symbol (enchant bow, light, poison prot)
In fact, there are no ranger spells with nature symbol components.
After 29 levels of Ranger, I have never used a nature symbol, but have researched the rules enough to know that the basil I keep in my pouch is necessary and that I have to pick a new leaf of holly each time I want to cast prot poison. I also keep green, red, and white tape as part of my dagger holster, just in case I need it.
fingers630 wrote:well half of the ranger spells require nature symbol (neutralize poison, feign death, cure light wounds) and half do not (prot poison, enchant bow, light)
page 149ish for ranger spells
Sir Gwydion wrote:I'm sorry, I was referencing the last three rulebooks that I had, and didn't reference the new rulebook where all material components were removed in what I would refer to as the "I don't want anything in the rules that I don't like" proposal of 2011.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest