Proposal - Spell Disruption

Forum for the discussion of proposals people would like to make.
User avatar
Inox
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 571
Joined: 2012-01-09

Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Inox » 2013-03-13

I propose changing: "If a weapon strikes the spell caster while he is holding a spell, the spell effects are visited fully upon the caster. For example, if a Mage is struck be an arrow while holding a cast Fireball spell, the spell detonates in the Mage’s hands."

To "If the spell caster is struck while he is holding a spell, the spell fails to work as intended. Spellballs detonate on the caster, and other spells simply fizzle."

Cosigners?
Prince Inox Elsonáge Thensiur
Swordslinger of No Quarter!
Warriors' Guild, OE, CCx8, CM(Warrior Mage)
Beast of BABALON

User avatar
Lord Valfryn
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 761
Joined: 2012-01-10
Location: The Bloodspire Mountains
Contact:

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Lord Valfryn » 2013-03-13

Cosign
Image

shroom2021
Darkonian
Posts: 162
Joined: 2012-01-10
Location: Somewhere in southern Elidor

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by shroom2021 » 2013-03-13

Cosign

User avatar
PadreCaedes
Darkonian
Posts: 127
Joined: 2012-01-16
Location: Temple of Khorne

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by PadreCaedes » 2013-03-13

Why not just have everything fizzle?
Warmaster Caedes, Kinslayer
Knight of Ched Nasad
Patron Father of House LeDouche

High Priest of Ched Nasad
Vicar of the Church of Khorne
Steward of NorthHold
House Ledouche: "We Bow to No Man...Because We Can't"

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-13

Yep Im fine either way.
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

User avatar
Lord Cailen Sendor
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 571
Joined: 2012-01-10
Location: Tarimsdadt conducting interviews for new members of the Royal Court
Contact:

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Lord Cailen Sendor » 2013-03-13

PadreCaedes wrote:Why not just have everything fizzle?


I think then we would lose the damage cause by a spell caster casting a fireball and being hit before being able to throw it

Spellballs detonate on the caster
++ Respect those above your station and train others under you to surpass your achievements - while you treat others with the respect you expect to receive in return! ++

mardux zulammar
Posts: 142
Joined: 2012-03-21

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by mardux zulammar » 2013-03-14

Would you be willing to alter the wording to "all other spells" and add "having no effect" after it says they fizzle? Seems a little more definitive and takes care of the guy 3 years from now who doesn't know what fizzle means.
~Member of the Northern Kingdoms
~Phoenix Company, Head of Artillery and Ranged
~Squire to Baron Tyriel Firebrand
~ (Ex)Head Spell Marshal
~Relics Marshal 2013-2014

User avatar
Amazing_Iltztafein
Darkonian
Posts: 548
Joined: 2012-01-06

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Amazing_Iltztafein » 2013-03-14

Lord Cailen Sendor wrote:
PadreCaedes wrote:Why not just have everything fizzle?


I think then we would lose the damage cause by a spell caster casting a fireball and being hit before being able to throw it

Spellballs detonate on the caster

I think that is his point, though - just have all magic work the same way. It's easier to know the rules that way. New people will have a harder time memorizing rules when we have certain rules for certain spells.

Also, this drastically changes feign death, which currently goes off when you get hit - one of the only real useful ways to use the spell during anything other than a massive melee where nobody is watching you.

LordTyrantCort
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 214
Joined: 2012-01-10

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by LordTyrantCort » 2013-03-14

So... Curse would limb the caster, creating a holy torso
Fireball, a pile of ash... Unless ya got the terrorist Mage with profire.
Lightning, take a black to the limb/arm
Hold person, a pillar of salt or a holy cleric sickle.
Icestorm, a block of magical Mage-sickle
Feeblemind, an idiot nal-brain Mage.
And so on and so forth....
Live for the slaughter
GLORIUS death

Knight of Ched Nasad
Survivor of The Asylum Mal'volus
Acolyte of GodThyanaos
OS...

User avatar
Lord Dubh
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 718
Joined: 2012-01-06
Location: Tarimstadt

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Lord Dubh » 2013-03-14

Warlordcort wrote:So... Curse would limb the caster, creating a holy torso
Fireball, a pile of ash... Unless ya got the terrorist Mage with profire.
Lightning, take a black to the limb/arm
Hold person, a pillar of salt or a holy cleric sickle.
Icestorm, a block of magical Mage-sickle
Feeblemind, an idiot nal-brain Mage.
And so on and so forth....


What about heal spells??

I think they should just fizzle. The Invocation Line is suppose to be the point at which the spell in manifested, prior to that the spell energy is just gathered but not manifested.
Sir Bendore Dubh of Dai-Dagan, CR, KR, OG, OR, CB, CC
Master Thief of Darkon


____

http://www.facebook.com/SirBendoreDubh/

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-14

Yes I believe Cort was proposing the "only spell balls have an affect" and everything else fizzles out and has no effect.

Would it be easier to say the spell ball effect centers on the caster? So Warp Wood and Fireball would retain their AOE just centered on the Mage/Druid disrupted? Again Im fine with them all just fizzling and doing nothing, but would support AOE off the disrupted caster too.
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

User avatar
Lord Valfryn
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 761
Joined: 2012-01-10
Location: The Bloodspire Mountains
Contact:

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Lord Valfryn » 2013-03-14

As long as the effect doesn't use AOE, i'm cool with it. I don't like the idea of a mage starting to cast fireball infront of a door that he sees fighters charging at, he doesn't have to finish the spell, but he gets to be a human landmine and kill 2-5 fighters without finishing a spell.

I find it hard to believe (even in a make believe sense) that the fireball is fully potent after reading 3 words. Maybe a "held spell" can blast like that.. but not an interrupted one.
Image

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-14

Yeah I say just say everything is disrupted, and no effect. Easier that way, and you dont have to worry about what is held, what is almost cast, etc.
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

User avatar
Amazing_Iltztafein
Darkonian
Posts: 548
Joined: 2012-01-06

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Amazing_Iltztafein » 2013-03-14

Lord Valfryn wrote:As long as the effect doesn't use AOE, i'm cool with it. I don't like the idea of a mage starting to cast fireball infront of a door that he sees fighters charging at, he doesn't have to finish the spell, but he gets to be a human landmine and kill 2-5 fighters without finishing a spell.

I find it hard to believe (even in a make believe sense) that the fireball is fully potent after reading 3 words. Maybe a "held spell" can blast like that.. but not an interrupted one.

I believe we are only talking about held spells here. We're talking about the act of disruption AFTER it is cast... Not while reading.

User avatar
Inox
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 571
Joined: 2012-01-09

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Inox » 2013-03-14

Alright, agreed.

Let's try changing this:

"If the caster speaks, fights, moves, or is hit by a weapon (including shafts) during spell casting, the spell is negated and the spell points are forfeited. If the caster wishes,he may then begin the spell again from the beginning.The spell is considered "cast" when the full spell has been read, up to, but not including the invocation line. Once the spell is cast, the caster may then hold the spell indefinitely before invoking it. While holding a spell, the caster may not speak, and is permitted to move no more than five steps from his original position. Also, while holding a spell, the caster may not be moved by another participant. If a weapon strikes the spell caster while he is holding a spell, the spell effects are visited fully upon the caster. For example, if a Mage is struck be an arrow while holding a cast Fireball spell, the spell detonates in the Mage’s hands."

To this:

"The spell is considered 'cast' when the full spell has been read, up to, but not including the invocation line. Once the spell is cast, the caster may then hold the spell indefinitely before invoking it. While holding a spell, the caster may not speak, and is permitted to move no more than five steps from his original position.

If the caster speaks, fights, moves before the spell is 'held', is moved by another participant, or is hit by a weapon (including shafts) or spellball before completing the invocation line, the spell is negated and the spell points are forfeited. If the caster wishes,he may then begin the spell again from the beginning."

Cosign?
Prince Inox Elsonáge Thensiur
Swordslinger of No Quarter!
Warriors' Guild, OE, CCx8, CM(Warrior Mage)
Beast of BABALON

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-14

Cosign.
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

exoduscleric
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 41
Joined: 2012-04-10

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by exoduscleric » 2013-03-14

I know this being picky, but I don't like the word "move" in the sentence "If the caster speaks, fights, moves, or is hit by a weapon (including shafts) during spell casting, the spell is negated and the spell points are forfeited." Technically the way this is written if I turn the page in my spellbook, I am moving and the spell is disrupted. It's ridiculous, but I've been told my spells were disrupted because my eyes supposedly looked up. If the intent is to write a clear description that can't be confused , then can we say something other than moves? I can completely see someone taking any movement (brushing hair out of eyes etc) as a disruption when I don't think that's your intent. I would assume you mean move the position of yourself as in walking or moving from one place to another. If we're taking the time to write a clear definition of something to replace one that some consider unclear, then let's make sure it's clear.

mardux zulammar
Posts: 142
Joined: 2012-03-21

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by mardux zulammar » 2013-03-14

Did you change it to say that regardless of the type of spell, it gets negated? If so, I'll cosign.

And I agree with Exodus, the word "moves" can be taken in a very wide range depending on the player that sees you move as well as the elders around.
~Member of the Northern Kingdoms
~Phoenix Company, Head of Artillery and Ranged
~Squire to Baron Tyriel Firebrand
~ (Ex)Head Spell Marshal
~Relics Marshal 2013-2014

User avatar
Inox
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 571
Joined: 2012-01-09

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Inox » 2013-03-14

Moves was the current lingo, but I am wide open to suggestions for changing it.

...and yes, negated regardless of type.
Prince Inox Elsonáge Thensiur
Swordslinger of No Quarter!
Warriors' Guild, OE, CCx8, CM(Warrior Mage)
Beast of BABALON

User avatar
Zodiac89
Posts: 63
Joined: 2012-10-23
Location: In the woods, communing with Nature.

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Zodiac89 » 2013-03-14

I've been told by a few vets that you're allowed to read out your spell, sans Invocation, move up to 5 paces, and then you're required to read the Invocation, and if your spell requires a ball to be thrown, you do so immediately after finishing your Invocation. Would this proposal force you to remain still during the entire process, ie, no more 5 paces movement and then invoke -> throw?
Barknell: Druid, observing the realm, beholding the beauty of Mother Nature.
Every rose has its thorns, every book, a story.

Never suffer Betrayal.

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-15

Zodiac89 wrote:I've been told by a few vets that you're allowed to read out your spell, sans Invocation, move up to 5 paces, and then you're required to read the Invocation, and if your spell requires a ball to be thrown, you do so immediately after finishing your Invocation. Would this proposal force you to remain still during the entire process, ie, no more 5 paces movement and then invoke -> throw?



Um...

Once the spell is cast, the caster may then hold the spell indefinitely before invoking it. While holding a spell, the caster may not speak, and is permitted to move no more than five steps from his original position.


No?
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

User avatar
Zodiac89
Posts: 63
Joined: 2012-10-23
Location: In the woods, communing with Nature.

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Zodiac89 » 2013-03-15

Thanks, Fingers. Missed that part. So, read spell, move 5 steps, hide there for an indefinite amount of time, suprise someone with a fireball. Cool beans!
Barknell: Druid, observing the realm, beholding the beauty of Mother Nature.
Every rose has its thorns, every book, a story.

Never suffer Betrayal.

User avatar
fingers630
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 1613
Joined: 2012-01-11
Location: In his Anti Magic Pants

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by fingers630 » 2013-03-15

np. my goal is to work on my ventriliquism so i can yell my invocation line out from behind them!
Justicar Lucius Alexander Crum
Archmage of Elidor and Lord of the Realm
Queen of the Silly People

______________________________________________________________________
"I'll grapple with greasy fingers... Just sayin'..."-Thrush

exoduscleric
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 41
Joined: 2012-04-10

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by exoduscleric » 2013-03-24

How about..." If the caster speaks, fights, takes a step before the spell is 'held', is moved by another participant, or is hit by a weapon (including shafts) or spellball before completing the invocation line, the spell is negated and the spell points are forfeited. If the caster wishes,he may then begin the spell again from the beginning."

I think the "moves before the spell is 'held'" could be misinterpreted to mean things it isn't meant to.

User avatar
Lord Valfryn
Knight of the Realm
Posts: 761
Joined: 2012-01-10
Location: The Bloodspire Mountains
Contact:

Re: Proposal - Spell Disruption

Post by Lord Valfryn » 2013-03-24

Implying that taking a step alone is movement, maybe:

" If the caster speaks, fights, changes his footing in any way (including taking a step) before the spell is 'held', is moved by another participant, or is hit by a weapon (including shafts) or spellball before completing the invocation line, the spell is negated and the spell points are forfeited. If the caster wishes,he may then begin the spell again from the beginning."
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests