Page 2 of 2

Re: Armigerous Awards

Posted: 2013-04-04
by President
I have to agree with some of the points Pat made. My biggest concern atm would be how few people have most of the awards so far. That coupled with a lack of any quorom requirement would be a receipe for disaster. Lets say Lord Frumpy Pants is the ONLY holder of a specific award at the Triumverate meeting. Let's say 3 people are up for it since nominations are wide open, one of whom is his bestest buddy Lord Lacey Shirt. The other 2 are much more quailified for said award, but Lord Frumpy Pants wants his bud to have it so he gives it to him. That would completely eliminate any respect the awards might bring.

Leave it as is for now. Give it a few years and see how it plays out.

Re: Armigerous Awards

Posted: 2013-04-05
by Thrush Svartehjertet
President wrote:Leave it as is for now. Give it a few years and see how it plays out.


Agreed. I plan to win best fighter for a decade. ;)

Thrush
berserk

Re: Armigerous Awards

Posted: 2013-04-05
by jayjay
i think it's good to have a way to tell people that do things for the game, thanks. that's what awards are. that being said, the people that are best at a thing should get the award. you don't like that so and so keeps getting it, then do a better job at whatever than they did.

Re: Armigerous Awards

Posted: 2013-04-06
by ylinett
Thrush, or Order of the Mask (Companion of the Mask) is a non-armigerous award, as is Swan, Crown, Boar...and as such has nothing to do with this proposal.

Re: Armigerous Awards

Posted: 2013-04-08
by Thrush Svartehjertet
What's your point?


Thrush
berserk